The author of the initial indemnity states that her Philippines Number Data commercial product was the only one to gain explicit exposure in the news article "Eight foods that seem healthy, but are not". The company explains in the process that the other topics, in addition to sweeteners, received generic illustrations. He also argued that the broadcast caused damage to his image, as he had to explain to many consumers about the safety of the product. In short, he said that the magazine acted irresponsibly by linking its product, unnecessarily, to possible harmful effects caused by excessive consumption of sweeteners, conveying the idea that all the products listed are harmful to health.
Unfounded sentence In the first degree, judge Ema Denize Massing, from the 2nd. Civil Court of Foro do Sarandi, in Porto Alegre, dismissed the compensation action as unfounded. She did not see in the report any sensational appeal or offensive character to the company's image that could support any request for compensation or retraction. "The article in which the image of the industrialized product was published by the author was limited to presenting the opinion of doctors and nutritionists about the harm caused by the excess consumption of sweeteners.